Nike Winflo 11 vs New Balance Fresh Foam 680v8:
Which to Choose

Nike Winflo 11 vs New Balance Fresh Foam 680v8
Verdict

These two are close enough that most runners would be well served by either, so let the details decide. Pick the Winflo 11 for a more traditional 10mm drop and a bit of forefoot bounce; pick the lighter 680v8 for its lower 8mm drop and slightly more supportive stable-neutral platform. If you value a livelier toe-off, go Nike; if you value a lighter, lower, planted ride for easy mileage, go New Balance.

Pace
3 of 6
Cushioning
3 of 6
Responsiveness
3 of 6
Stability
4 of 6

Drop

10 mm

Support

Neutral

Plate

None

Distances

10KHalf
Pace
3 of 6
Cushioning
3 of 6
Responsiveness
2 of 6
Stability
4 of 6

Drop

8 mm

Support

Stable Neutral

Plate

None

Distances

10KHalf

At a Glance

PaceCushioningResponsivenessStability
Nike Winflo 11New Balance Fresh Foam 680v8

Who Should Choose Each Shoe

Choose
Nike Winflo 11

Choose the Winflo 11 if you're a newer or heel-striking runner who wants the slightly more traditional 10mm geometry and values that touch of forefoot Zoom Air pop to make steady and tempo efforts feel a little more alive. It's the better pick for someone building toward a half who occasionally wants to pick up the pace and appreciates a bit more spring at toe-off, even at the cost of a few extra grams.

Choose
New Balance Fresh Foam 680v8

Choose the Fresh Foam 680v8 if you want the lighter shoe (about 29g less) and a slightly lower 8mm drop that nudges you toward a more natural mid/forefoot roll, and if you have neutral-to-mildly-overpronating feet that benefit from its stable-neutral platform. It suits the runner who logs relaxed, consistent aerobic miles, doesn't care about rebound, and prioritizes a planted, durable, predictable feel over any liveliness.

Head-to-Head

On paper these shoes are near-twins: both are neutral-leaning trainers with above-average stability from wide, planted platforms, moderate (not maximal) cushioning, no plate, and a shared sweet spot of 5:30–6:30 min/km easy-to-steady running, fading when you ask for true speed. The real separators are three. First, ride feel: the Winflo 11 carries a forefoot Zoom Air unit that adds a genuine hint of pop as you roll onto your toes, giving it a slightly livelier toe-off, while the 680v8's single-density Fresh Foam is flatter and more lifeless underfoot — more responsive on the Nike (3/6) versus a distinctly low 2/6 on the New Balance. Second, geometry: the Winflo runs a traditional 10mm drop that favors heel-strikers and developing form, whereas the 680v8's 8mm drop sits a touch lower and encourages a slightly more mid/forefoot roll. Third, weight: in men's sizing the Winflo 11 is around 297g while the 680v8 is lighter at about 268g, a roughly 30g gap you'll notice on longer efforts. Both can feel a bit flat late in long runs as the firm foams tire your legs, and both lean toward predictability over fun. The 680v8's stable-neutral tuning also leans marginally more toward mild-overpronation support than the Winflo's pure neutral platform.

Similar Comparisons

Nike Winflo 11 vs Nike Winflo 12

Nike Winflo 11 vs Nike Winflo 12

New Balance Fresh Foam 680v8 vs Asics Gel-Pulse 16

New Balance Fresh Foam 680v8 vs Asics Gel-Pulse 16

Nike Winflo 11 vs Brooks Revel 8

Nike Winflo 11 vs Brooks Revel 8

New Balance Fresh Foam 680v8 vs New Balance Fresh Foam 680v9

New Balance Fresh Foam 680v8 vs New Balance Fresh Foam 680v9

Nike Winflo 11 vs Adidas Ultraboost 5X

Nike Winflo 11 vs Adidas Ultraboost 5X

New Balance Fresh Foam 680v8 vs Nike Quest 6

New Balance Fresh Foam 680v8 vs Nike Quest 6

Nike Winflo 11 vs Asics Gel-Pulse 16

Nike Winflo 11 vs Asics Gel-Pulse 16

© 2026 longrunshoes.ai | All rights reserved.

Use of materials from this site is permitted only with proper attribution and a link to longrunshoes.ai.