Saucony Endorphin Pro 4 vs Brooks Hyperion Elite 4 PB:
Which to Choose

Start with how alike these two are, because the similarity is the headline. Both run an 8mm heel-to-toe drop, both sit at essentially the same height — the Endorphin Pro 4 measures 39.5mm heel / 31.5mm forefoot and the Hyperion Elite 4 PB 40mm / 32mm — and both pair a PEBA-based superfoam (Saucony's PWRRUN PB, Brooks' DNA Gold) with a full-length carbon plate. Both score identically in our data on pace, cushioning, responsiveness and stability, both call the half their sweet spot, and both share the same honest weakness: a tall, soft racing platform that feels lively and propulsive at pace but tippy and unsettled when you slow to a jog. Where they separate is weight and platform shape. The Hyperion is the lighter shoe — Brooks lists it around 204g for a men's sample versus roughly 218g for the Endorphin Pro 4 at a comparable size — and it runs on a noticeably narrower base, which makes it feel quick and nimble but also more demanding of a precise, planted footstrike. The Endorphin Pro 4's platform is a touch broader and its ride leans slightly softer and more cushioned underfoot, with a pronounced rocker that tips you onto your toes and rewards a high cadence; the Hyperion's transition feels a hair firmer and snappier, rolling you forward hard the moment you're moving fast. Neither offers any pronation support — these are confident-runner tools — and both use thin, breathable race uppers that trade some lockdown and long-haul durability for low weight.