Brooks Ghost 18 vs Brooks Glycerin 23:
Which to Choose

Brooks Ghost 18 vs Brooks Glycerin 23
Verdict

It depends on ride feel and geometry, not performance ceiling — both are comfort-oriented neutral trainers that cap out at the same easy-to-steady paces. Go with the Ghost 18 for a firmer, lighter, higher-drop ride that rewards predictability, or the Glycerin 23 for maximum plushness, a lower drop, and a taller forefoot on your softest, longest miles.

Pace
3 of 6
Cushioning
4 of 6
Responsiveness
3 of 6
Stability
4 of 6

Drop

12 mm

Support

Neutral

Plate

None

Distances

10KHalfMarathon
Pace
3 of 6
Cushioning
5 of 6
Responsiveness
3 of 6
Stability
4 of 6

Drop

8 mm

Support

Neutral

Plate

None

Distances

10KHalfMarathon

At a Glance

PaceCushioningResponsivenessStability
Brooks Ghost 18Brooks Glycerin 23

Who Should Choose Each Shoe

Choose
Brooks Ghost 18

Choose the Ghost 18 if you're a heel striker or a newer runner who wants a firm, predictable, dependable everyday trainer and prefers the calf relief of a tall 12 mm drop. It's the lighter shoe here and the better fit for someone who finds very soft foam mushy or unstable and would rather have a controlled, planted roll for daily and long training miles.

Choose
Brooks Glycerin 23

Choose the Glycerin 23 if plush, impact-swallowing comfort is your top priority — it's the softer, more cushioned shoe, ideal for high-mileage runners, recovery days, and relaxed long miles where soft landings matter more than turnover. Its lower 8 mm drop and thicker 29 mm forefoot suit runners who want a more level, natural forefoot feel and don't mind carrying slightly more weight for the extra cushioning.

Head-to-Head

These two land close in intent but diverge in feel. Both use a 37 mm heel and nitrogen-infused foam, but that's where the similarity narrows: the Ghost 18 runs DNA Loft v3 with a 25 mm forefoot and a tall 12 mm drop, while the Glycerin 23 uses the newer DNA Tuned foam with a 29 mm forefoot and a lower 8 mm drop. In practice the Ghost feels cushioned but firm and controlled — a planted, no-drama roll that heel strikers and newer runners tend to find predictable — whereas the Glycerin is noticeably plusher, with a soft, impact-swallowing heel and a slightly firmer forefoot to keep you from sinking. Cushioning is where the Glycerin pulls ahead (rated very high versus the Ghost's high), and its lower drop plus taller forefoot give a more level, cushioned platform underfoot. The trade-off is weight: the Ghost 18 comes in at 289 g in a men's US 9 against the Glycerin 23's 303 g, so the Ghost is the lighter, slightly more nimble of the two. Neither is responsive — both are plateless with medium-to-below-average rebound and top out around a 5:00 min/km effort before the foam starts feeling vague — so this is genuinely a comfort-and-geometry decision, not a speed one. Stability is comparable: both are broad, planted neutral platforms with no pronation posting, though the Ghost's firmer foam reads as marginally more controlled.

Similar Comparisons

Brooks Ghost 18 vs Brooks Ghost AMP

Brooks Ghost 18 vs Brooks Ghost AMP

Brooks Glycerin 22 vs Brooks Glycerin 23

Brooks Glycerin 22 vs Brooks Glycerin 23

Saucony Ride 19 vs Brooks Ghost 18

Saucony Ride 19 vs Brooks Ghost 18

Nike Vomero Plus vs Brooks Glycerin 23

Nike Vomero Plus vs Brooks Glycerin 23

Brooks Ghost 17 vs Brooks Ghost 18

Brooks Ghost 17 vs Brooks Ghost 18

Brooks Glycerin 23 vs Brooks Glycerin Flex

Brooks Glycerin 23 vs Brooks Glycerin Flex

Nike Pegasus 42 vs Brooks Ghost 18

Nike Pegasus 42 vs Brooks Ghost 18

Brooks Ghost 18 vs Brooks Ghost Max 4

Brooks Ghost 18 vs Brooks Ghost Max 4

© 2026 longrunshoes.ai | All rights reserved.

Use of materials from this site is permitted only with proper attribution and a link to longrunshoes.ai.