Adidas Supernova Prima 2 vs Saucony Hurricane 25:
Which to Choose

Start with the broad agreement: both run a mild drop (8mm on the Prima 2, 7mm on the Hurricane 25), both skip a propulsion plate, both score 4/6 for responsiveness and 5/6 for stability, and both top out well short of race pace. From there they diverge in instructive ways. The Hurricane is the more maximal, more protective shoe — maximum cushioning (6/6) on a taller platform of roughly 40mm heel / 33mm forefoot, with a plush PEBA-based PWRRUN PB top layer over a firmer PWRRUN base and CenterPath geometry that gently corrects a mild-to-moderate overpronating stride. The Prima 2 is high cushioning (5/6) on a lower platform of roughly 37mm heel / 29mm forefoot, using Boost foam with Dreamstrings TPU cords that steady the foot for a neutral-to-mild overpronator without ever feeling corrective. That difference in intent shows up underfoot: the Hurricane's superfoam takes more initial sting and feels plusher but muted, while the Prima 2's Boost gives a livelier, more controlled return. Weight is the other decider — the Prima 2 is the lighter shoe at around 264g against roughly 286g for the notably heavy Hurricane, and that gap is felt the moment you try to lift the pace. It also shapes range: the Prima 2 is comfortable from 10K through the half and into the marathon with an effective ceiling near 4:45–5:00/km, whereas the Hurricane is a 10K-and-half shoe at heart, happiest at steady aerobic effort and running out of legs around 5:15/km as the weight works against you.